I don't see your point. All that says is that the settlement is not an admission of a violation of law. My point is is that I've been trying to get validation from a CA for over 2 months. I faxed an intent to sue as this CA has verified the tradeline 2X with the CRA, put a dupe tradeline on Equifax, and 2 days after the ITS pulled a hard inquiry. Today I get a threatening letter from the dumbass Atty. telling me that if I choose to file an unsubstantiated claim, they reserve the right to seek sanctions againt me for filing a frivolous lawsuit. To which I emailed him and told him the first question the judge is going to ask him is why haven't they validated the debt in over 2 months? I don't think a judge would consider my lawsuit frivolous at that point. I also told him that he was not going to bully me out of my rights as a citizen of this country. With that being said, why couldn't I take that FTC settlement letter to sort of get the judge thinking" If the FTC made this company delete in 5 days when they couldn't validate, why has this CA taken over 2 months"
I have received the same BS info from several people I called regarding inquiries about my credit report.
On all the purchases I made I had generated a separate shopeSafe number characteristic of a mastercard .
(Fulton bank personal loans) The original Company A only sent us a note stating that our "financing contract has been sold to JAC" I smell a lawsuit coming on.
Subskrybuj:
Komentarze do posta (Atom)
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz